Some observations about the designs from my perspective as Head Judge. I may not post for every episode. Only when I feel the need to extend the conversation!
Most people watch a show like Interior Design Masters and comment on what they see. You describe the colours, comment on the pizazz (or not), and pick a fave. It makes sense. What else do you have to go on via the medium of television. We also automatically filter everything we see through our personal preferences for colour (brights or more muted), style (maxi or minimal), era (retro to modern), vibe (calm vs chaotic!) etc.
But liking something — and it actually working — are not the same thing. As such good design is never just about the way something looks. Also, it’s not Interior Decoration Masters!
This is why I absolutely love a challenge like our opener: design a beach hut in your signature style. Ten identical spaces. Ten completely different outcomes. If design were purely visual, how could you meaningfully judge them beyond taste? For example, on paper, the idea of channelling the royal family in a beach hut sounds ridiculous. And yet, done well, it absolutely works.

Because here’s the thing, in reality, if you were physically in the room, before you’ve formed an opinion, your nervous system would have already responded, assessing the space for clarity, coherence, ease, comfort. It has decided whether it can relax into it — or subtly resist, based on how it feels. And in a challenge like this — small space, tight timeline, high pressure — that effect is the maker or breaker. These are the three key design pointers that when combined, made the truly winning designs.
1. The power of one clear idea
What stood out most for me in this first episode was who made a design decision — and stuck to it (remembering too that the brief was show me your signature style). In a space this small, there simply isn’t room for multiple directions. Every additional idea competes for attention. Every extra gesture adds noise.
The beach huts that worked best all shared one thing in common: They had a single, legible concept — and everything in the space reinforced it.
Whether it was the rhythm of colour carried across ceiling panels, or a defined palette that moved consistently from wall to furniture to object, there was no hesitation. No second-guessing. No attempt to hedge bets. Just a clear point of view, followed through with confidence from inside to out. This is what enables us to be transported to the Amalfi coast, and not be troubled by the geographical dislocation.


2. Coherence matters more than impact
There’s a common misconception, especially under pressure, that impact comes from contrast. From adding more. From pushing harder. But the rooms that hold your attention aren’t the ones shouting the loudest. They’re the ones where everything is in conversation.
In the strongest spaces here, colour wasn’t used as a series of moments. It was used as a system. Repeated, echoed, resolved. Nothing felt accidental. And that’s the difference between a room that merely looks “interesting” in a photograph, and one that actually feels great to be in.




3. Layout is not secondary — it is the design
Another pattern that emerged — and often determines success more than anything else — is layout. You can decorate beautifully, but if the space doesn’t function, the body registers that friction immediately. In small spaces especially, every decision about placement matters.
Where you sit.
What you face.
How you move.
The strongest designs understood this. They built in storage without making it visible. They integrated seating rather than placing it. They allowed the space to open up, rather than closing it down. They remembered that the view was the thing.








So what are you really responding to?
And how do you take this home.
When you find yourself saying you “like” a room, it’s worth asking why. Is it the colour? The objects? The styling? Or is it something quieter — a sense that the space just makes sense? Because the truth is, and this is what’s important when it comes to doing your own home, the rooms that work are the ones where nothing is fighting for for more attention than anything else. This absolutely doesn’t mean it all has to be bland and beige, rather it’s about cohesion. It’s the rooms where everything feels intentional. The ones where your body, not just your eye, can settle.
Remembering that design isn’t a purely visual exercise. It’s a behavioural one.
IDM Episode 2 Decoded
Notes on the designs from my perspective as Head Judge, Interior Design Masters
Or to put it another way, your home is not just something you look at. It’s something that shapes how you feel, how you move, and ultimately, how you live and who you become. You can read more about this here. #homeishealth






Thank you for this insight. We are in the process of converting a VW I.D. Buzz Cargo van into a mobile living space that my partner and I can use to explore Britain and beyond. Layout is critical, we need to utilise every bit of this very limited space. Coherence is the difference between it looking amateurish and a design we enjoy and appreciate. Thanks for consolidating my design philosophy!
There were some excellent huts and clearly some very talented designers. I totally agreed with the choice of standout space. Looking forward to the next episode xx